Ann: Trading Halt, page-148

So they’re looking to just skate through until September.
$8million would have been better to give them
some breathing room.

They’ve just started the clock again & if NAIF doesn’t come through they will be back to a weak position to negotiate from.

SK etc will just watch the clock tick down.

I’m guessing quite a few holders are really getting tired of seeing a certain person’s name & signature attached to these things.

$5.76 to extract with a lower cut off & smaller deposit than some others. Ouch.

Miner? Battery maker? Alloy pioneer?

Stick to mining. Core business activity.
Eyes on the prize- nickel & cobalt.

If you have assets which are not part of that core activity then get rid of them & stop acting like you’re going to be the biggest & best at everything when you haven’t even got enough cash in the bank to survive on your own for at least a year.

I’m pretty sure even the biggest established battery makers haven’t pretended that they are miners. ( even though they could thanks to their financial firepower ).

If I was 100% ( as close to as humanly possible ), my mine was going to be built I’d be 100% focused on making that happen.

Mine. Battery maker ambitions. Alloy maker ambitions. 3 items of focus. Being simple I’ll say they have 33% belief in each of those avenues or at least that their focus is somewhat divided by 3 targets.

For the past 6-12 mths the board has failed to prove people with my point of view wrong.

It’s high time they did so. At least once.