Hand on heart of course it's not disclosure.But in this...

Hand on heart of course it's not disclosure.
But in this litigious world of our in general everyone passes the buck so they don't go responsible for anything they think or say.
In this case I honestly think the question is a fair one.

I think from a PR exercise point of view the company might get more people interested if some of the pure commercial basics or thoughts thereto would make everything more transparent.
Instead of MOUS and Licenses - those are just announcements and from what I see all the costs associated are with Clear vue.
Clear Vue still shows no income but they have a lot of quasi promissory notes floating around.

The only hurt money in all this applies to Clear Vue and after the R and D money and seeing the burn rate, not far down the line they are going to have to raise capital.
And what will the story be or what's the best case scenario.

I commend the disciples for their efforts in keeping comments buoyant but a lot of it is or could be called disguised ramping. That's the name of the share market game in companies pedaling dreams.

I don't say Clear vue are pedaling dreams. I'm not qualified to pass opinion on Clear vue Technology. I am qualified to offer opinion on the Dog eat Dog world out there.
All I ask is if everything works according to plan will it be viable from a commerical point of view and of course effiency as well that this has sustainability and what are the threats of impostors challenging the status quo and coming up with even more available technology.