Not so sure it is HIS money, am thinking it might be Hackett's (or a mate's) money through another dummy company. Either way it is certainly voting money to secure continued control of the Board and continued fee services.
As for $50m out of $5m, on the current business trajectory it wont get to $50m in a few decades let alone a few years, the trajectory needs to change as does the direction as does the stewardship before that target is even possible let alone achievable.
Not so sure it is HIS money, am thinking it might be Hackett's...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 45 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
