WIPO clearly doesn't remove the role of legal advice as a slight mistranslation can make a patent unworkable and worthless - there'll still be the role for an expert reviewer. It might however reduce what can be charged significantly if they are charging for just review/advice/tidying up/lodgment without translation which I would imagine is quite a lucrative additional charge. Of course if the cost of patent transfer is less there may also be greater demand!
WIPO clearly doesn't remove the role of legal advice as a slight...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IPH (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$5.06 |
Change
0.090(1.81%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.578B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $5.02 | $5.09 | $5.01 | $3.732M | 737.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3296 | $5.05 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $5.06 | 3392 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IPH (ASX) Chart |
