Details on the issue are very vague and it appears to be around...

Details on the issue are very vague and it appears to be around cheaper chemicals being used that are open to counterfeiting. From a reading of the SMH article the question arises was the advice of CSIRO involved or did DDT make such a decision on their own. If its the former then surely CSIRO would also be open to any litigation or costs associated with this fiasco. I was sincerely hoping that DDT was about to turn the corner. This episode would appear to put the final nail in the coffin