I think referring a section 249D application that seeks to...

I think referring a section 249D application that seeks to change a Board to the takeovers panel was:
(a) desperate
(b) doomed to fail or achieve its stated request
(c) undemocratic in its desire to not allow valid shareholders to have their say
(d) an inappropriate waste of shareholder funds, and
(e) suggests to me that those running the Company don't deserve my support and should move on

In that regard (and only in that regard), I have found it helpful in making up my mind on voting.