Hi Quanta, I 100% agree with your statement, but I'd like to be...

Hi Quanta,

I 100% agree with your statement, but I'd like to be so bold as to ask why you posted this about the dfs. What I'm wondering is if you felt the pfs lacked completeness or details (e.g. the flow sheet was missed, yet supplied in the Noosa presentation) that you want to see corrected in the dfs.

This is my feeling on the pfs. I have spoken with TMT and they are confident / happy with the pfs - however if one takes into account the detail supplied in the SS / base pfs for AVL and missing flow sheet - I do want to see a thorough, complete DFS.

so your statement has resonated with me somewhat.