Some shareholders seem to think they have a major entitlement to being hand fed everything; not just direct comms but also backing research, commercially sensitive information & constant restating of answers to questions already answered in a prospectus supposedly read and understood before they put up capital etc.
I do applaud @Caossuits for actually having the initiative to contact the company direct, especially since CGB openly invites all holders to do so and the CEO personally responds.
Alot seem to think the company has the resources and obligation to contact each individual shareholder on a one-on-one basis and then vilify when this doesn't happen. Communication is a two way street.
Little people talk about big people, big people talk about themselves, and smart people talk about ideas and goals. It is often a statement of wisdom I follow when reading through posts and I would encourage all to add that to the grain of salt they should be taking whilst reading commentary, both positive and negative.
We all play the same waiting game regardless of what's said in here either way.