@rodrod1
I need time to put all the data in, but they are well below my expectation, that should have been the heart of the high grade deposit & wasn't.
I was expecting that part of the deposit to be enhancing the previous figures of 1.54% Cu, 21.3 g/t silver & 29M thickness, instead it will be diluting them
It's also reducing the overall length & width of the deposit as well, thus taking T's from its size.
Disappointing to say the least (maybe my expectation's were higher than other peoples).
LOTM