Simply put, the winning party doesn't automatically have a costs order made against it. "Simply put POH had a claim against MYLAN but the main reason POH failed in it's claims was not taking the "invention" any further in developing / marketing it and hence did not "loose anything"in other words POH F%#&%d up in it's claims strategy...IMHO I think there may be no cost order made against POH as the ArbiTRATOR won't give MYLAN a free run...
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Suspension from Official Quotation
Simply put, the winning party doesn't automatically have a costs...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add POH (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! n/a |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
POH (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable