shhht @natandsal been more than helpful in questioning the OHD...

shhht @natandsal been more than helpful in questioning the OHD trials along the way and, gosh, what do you know .... and funny how it turns out they were spot on about the "world class research institution" who shouldn't have been having their methodology questioned - that ended well didn't it

If people had listened to their extensive on the land experience and knowledge at the time that they offered it perhaps holders wouldn't be suffering misery now and may have bailed (or mostly) like ermmm "the believers". I sure hope they are feeling smug though, they deserve to; but they don't come across as the types that would at shareholders expense - quite the opposite, I believe they simply tried to forewarn people. All they did was question the veracity of the trials (specifically the end point) and everyone would be a fool to not question them at this point now surely? I also note with interest that there's been no clarifying statement on the 300% yield since the last little stuff up

And never say "I have never" until you've used the search function

Enjoy your weekend @cfp