i always find with litigation, regardless of the jurisdiction, there are critical aspects that determine how well a case resolves
critical is the level of documentation that supports your claim, the basis of everything. you win or lose on how good your contracts are and how well supported your further documentation in support of that claim is
equally a well prepared legal team is what gets results. getting quality and qualified legal opinion to examine every aspect of what your presenting is what drives the results.
xstate has always maintained it has warned the sanston 4 they were in default, serving documents on them that they were in default, they equally always assured xstate they were going to meet their obligations. xstate were forced to issue proceedings and claim damages, something they warned the sanston 4 about repeatedly, and they kept on assuring xstate they would meet their obligation and pay.
i am trying to think of what they can possibly defend on. xstate have stated they have never been told by the santon 4 they contest anything.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- XST
- Ann: Subscription Agreements Legal Update
Ann: Subscription Agreements Legal Update, page-74
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add XST (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.893M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
XST (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable