@pp Just looking at the proposed next hole, am I right in...

@pp

Just looking at the proposed next hole, am I right in thinking that this hole will run right along hole 5 but extend a little deeper ? If so why wouldn't they just re-enter 5 and go deeper would that be cheaper and give the same result or is the slight degree of difference what's required to get a better look at the conductor?

Also, was this the area that they remodelled to be about 260m v 450m ? Doesn't this latest announcement give further weight to their findings as the centre of this conductor is smack bang in there re-assessment , surely they must be gaining confidence that they are getting close to finding the "needle"....

Giddy up