"
"And whilst on that topic - the pro posters have not responded to the all too obvious questions arising out of one of my earlier posts." 37350374And you can add to this discussion? Well ... let's see your point of view then! 
I have given you my reasoning on this & can't comment for others however I do feel you are perhaps infatuated or obsessed (& possibly not in a good way) to get a response for your very obvious posts as you keep asking repetitively since the first time you asked. I have asked you for your thoughts on certain things which you haven't answered so I guess it's a matter of choice. Perhaps they have done their diligence & don't feel as passionately as you do around the same topic. @PinnacleFirstly, thanks for the respectful tone.
I have quoted the above for one reason.
Your answer to that paragraph deals with trying to understand my motivation (the infatuated and obsessed) as opposed to providing a response to the question.
The issues arising from that matter are obvious and people seem to walk straight past the facts. It is not as though it is a historical matter (the case was heard in 2017) - I think it is very relevant to today.
Worry less about my rationale and more about the facts would be my suggestion.
Fact is, I have been watching this share probably longer than many here and as such I am reasonably well qualified to make valid and supported points.
"
I have asked you for your thoughts on certain things which you haven't answered"
Yes - I apologise for that - I noticed that question of yours when the thread got out of hand the other day. As a result, I decided to address your question at a later time. I will respond tomorrow for you if that's ok?
Very busy today.
