and it gets worse.... in the cross sections the mineralisation is depicted as 'open' down dip. a quick peek at figure 4 indicates that it most certainly is not 'open' down dip. mis-representation of results at its worst, and so obvious that any observant investor can see it.
any ni geos care to comment on the possibility of a lava-tube style deposit that was not known about when this thing was first discovered? could there be a significant deposit along strike, down dip, plunging?
