Agree PSI, but all I mean is that the volume of water they are dealing with (lower than expected when they originally announced shield wells) altered their view on what the intention of Klebb 2 and 3 were for. The sole focus originally was to assist dewater of Klebb1, the focus has changed now to what these wells can realise in their own right if they are fracced. Agree they are all production wells but there is a change in view about them because of that lower water handling requirement.
but yes - this is small detail in the overall project. I was just trying to highlight that there is a change of mindset there.
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.8¢ |
Change
0.003(1.22%) |
Mkt cap ! $644.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.0¢ | 21.0¢ | 20.5¢ | $159.1K | 761.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 1619750 | 20.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.0¢ | 883576 | 19 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.18pm 02/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |
