One comment I will make though PSI, you say "First there is...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 4,041 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 331
    One comment I will make though PSI,
    you say "First there is confirmation that as I predicted, the non-frac wells wouldn't perform well enough to act as shield wells and will need to be fracced."

    I think they intended for them to be shield wells but after a period of flow back on Klebb the amount of water they thought they had to deal with was substantially less than anticipated. So the thinking then switched to completing them as per the other two production wells, rather than their main purpose being to dewater the formation.
    Yes they still assist in dewatering the surrounding formation but I am fairly sure they are not fraccing these wells to just gain that shield assistance for Klebb pilot - rather it is so they can become fully fledged production wells in their own right.
    All I am saying is the purpose of completion decision may have changed rather than your suggestion that the purpose of them is still for dewatering only. But I understand your reasoning around speed of dewatering to get those large gas flows.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
20.8¢
Change
0.003(1.22%)
Mkt cap ! $644.7M
Open High Low Value Volume
21.0¢ 21.0¢ 20.5¢ $134.3K 641.4K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
30 1610019 20.5¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
21.0¢ 896295 19
View Market Depth
Last trade - 11.59am 02/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
STX (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.