'... with 1,672 shareholders being removed from the registry there will be a significant administrative cost saving moving forward."
IMO THE ONE shareholder that should be removed from the registry, BoD and perhaps the market altogether, and removal of whom can save enormous administrative costs is no other than our own excellency (NOT) BoD!
Ummmm Mr, Mars needs to be colonised and I have heard there are lots of untapped planet (not just district) scale mining opportunities there. If you continue to fail to communicate from there, it won't concern SHs, so that is the place perhaps to go and experiment with your communication "skills" (or there lack of) and apply your "claimed" qualifications, application of which frequently needs a wee bit of an help from external consultants AND lots of $$$ paid to them by us! So, PLEASE consider taking your next project there and list it as a new company - if you do that, I WILL invest in i (take my word for it, and surly you will, as we have taken ur word for BS for a long time). As a SH we are already used to funding your intra-planetary trips and I am sure SHs are more than happy to help fund your inter-planetary trip.
And speaking of "moving forward", those people who have ended up with un-marketable shares of under $500 MOST CERTAINLY bought them as marketable parcels, i.e., likely at a significantly high price and hence perhaps low volume, to then be un-marketable now. So, some 1672 poor "mum-and-dads" have lost potentially their life investment which they told their kids this is "Green" investment, undoubtedly to some (if not arguably large) extent, as a result of GPP poor-management (as also admired by management, hence the review) ....
... and guess who is "moving forward" with sill marketable parcel due to high volume (partly contributed by the bonus shares) while those poor mum-and-dads are left in the DUST!
Expand
