Ok I'll bite....... and FWIW i used to respect your willingness...

Ok I'll bite....... and FWIW i used to respect your willingness to debate (specially on the OHD) but unfortunately you have fallen into the mould of the pro/cheer squad GPP group and prefer to question the poster versus the content of the post.

Why my healths sake?

Move on?

Band of followers?

I actually liked the potential of OHD, but like you that potential (hope) has shifted to Lithium as this bunch may never be able to get the OHD project to the finish line. So no, I don't think little of the stock, management are a different kettle of fish though.

Lets be clear on one thing though, I care for management - care that they abide by the rules that govern them for being listed on the ASX and by the rules of the Corporations Act and if me being a thorn in their side, reporting them for alleged indiscretions to the ASX/ASIC wheres they have to explain themselves good, obviously the never learnt the lesson of their obligations when they withheld material information and were issued with a please explain when they announced the grant being rejected days after being notified.
The RJIP grant was no different, and Im glad they were forced to make an announcement in regards to it.

What else don't they report????? (no it isn't an accusation) Just saying.....
I mean it is twice in 5 months now.

Just a curiosity question for you:
If I changed my sentiment towards management to suit your investment would I be allowed to stay?
I'm only asking because heavens forbid, not one of you pro GPP/management posters on this thread can actually point me to any post where I have been wrong/incorrect with factual information I have shared (wether you like it or not) Not one of you will debate the management issues, but prefer to post "childish" cartoons and make one line remarks (the childish isn't referring to you)
Before you say, yes but you go on and on and on, maybe I do but I DO NOT see you chastising the posters that go on and on and on with repeated information on how good GPP is, why?????
Or poster (@anatol) that delivers a massive post on NT fracking that may never be relevant to GPP but is acceptable? Don't get me wrong, it was fantastic research but again, not relevant to GPP (IMO) but that opinion is only from his previous history and what I took from scarpa's post.

All IMO only
cheers