It would have been a thrill to see wide section and more massive sulphides, but alas 'no'.
RC1 was drilled 200ms north-west of AC12. In between is AC 124 which had nothing. So why would we have expected something special with RC1? Refer to Figure 2 on page 2!
It looks like RC2 will be drilled near AC 19, 400ms to the south-west of RC1. Its purpose is to 'provide further geological context and another deep platform for DHEM'.
As Skins68 states, RC1 was not empty even though the preamble says no 'visible mineralisation'.
Here look at Fig 3 and the Table beneath:
It would have been a thrill to see wide section and more massive...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
