Indeed!! RC1 was drilled exactly where AC125 was drilled - same...

Indeed!!

RC1 was drilled exactly where AC125 was drilled - same co-ords, same azimuth, same dip - and it showed no massive sulphides, even though only 15m deep.

RC1 had its purposes, probably the main of which was to DHEM. It's 200m NW of RC 112 (ms), but Karl says that it has the potential to identify conductive accumulations of massive sulphides over a broad radius from the drill hole. I wonder, 'how broad'?

I wouldn't be at all surprised that RC2 is being drilled exactly where another AC hole was drilled.

Anyway, assays could be revealing, one way or the other.