Stop playing with semantics and assumptions.  It is cleverly...

Stop playing with semantics and assumptions.  It is cleverly worded because that's what business does. 

Most posters would be aware of the vexatious games at play, unfortunately, its not clever and the games are certainly not from the company!  It's only fair that In the same way GEO_AU interprets it as multiple, others may also interpret it differently.  IMO when you are in negotiation you NEVER mention who or what may be interested, I call that clever business.

As far as Isabel is concerned IMO, we may have a 30 day wait when a problem has arisen between negotiating parties, so post Christmas would provide any progress, before that we may have leaks from those that may not be happy with the current deal, all IMO and based on the SI mining process and LOI that requires a reasonable level of agreement.

GLTA Holders