Ann: San Jorge Mining Update, page-29

I think - on easy balance - that if this is what you say: that there would be far more to it . ( both the ‘statement ‘ and if were any truth within )
Oh boy .
And - that be nil significance right here or now .

Pls also - I think or then would wonder - ? why such a person even saying something like this - to me there will not be fundamentally an issue with true relationship of standing , between axiom and relevant landowners they negotiate with - if such a person were to be posting such in HC ?
As a constant ? contributor , there be reasons behind - motivations . Can’t know .

Please, wish you take care of you - leave axiom and shareholders alone . No joy in pervading such malintent to even refer to sounding negative - without a reason or bitterness.
So I wish you enough — so that you will be happier , move on and then to let all here with avq go . Are your choices alone . As for all .

**Axiom does deserve respect from and must continue hold respect with - the local people who do own the land tenements .

I hope the landowners have soon seen the last of all stirring of discontent ! Been horrendous .

But - over 50 years of .. then recent times again — going on 15 years now

Those who want to have their land mined, in the specific Isabel tenements Axiom holds intent over - can surely be a part of the future with axiom , and will have signed . (SAAs again )

Otherwise, “que sera sera “ ~no one can do anything about people who don’t want to be a part of developments !

Shareholders have been long suffering.
*Useful information, if definitely valid , and is not again from sideline ongoing stirring (‘fake news ‘even ) - is always good . Of course

I wish you a fair , and a good future ! ( Should not have tried to respond directly to - will leave you be ) BOLTA