'facts are the sig issued axiom a LOI for a PL, axiom got the majority of landholders support to issue a PL. now the MMB have declined it? on what grounds?"
Probably same grounds as before when Axiom claimed to have required land owner support but actually didn't - as the courts proved.
Seems therefore pretty obvious on what grounds MMB has declined Axiom.
Ground hog day.
'facts are the sig issued axiom a LOI for a PL, axiom got the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
