rejected by the "contract superintendent"... that doesn't sound like a court and doesn't sound like something where sedgman/cimic would just say you keep the $50m and we'll just accept that
is that superintendent employed by Heron? surely it would go to arbitration and then if required into the courts
rejected by the "contract superintendent"... that doesn't sound...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
