I'm not as clever as you. Maybe you can point out which ann. exactly says
why Lord muck is on the board, and why he is there, how he will participate as
a director, whilst living in London. Thank you.
"
the recent (and change of) appointments ann's
"
The date and tile of these anns are ????
So only investors in the U.K. market would see the potential in AUL?
Sounds like you are all getting desperate to find reasons to make this succeed.
All these anns./drill results, and most times it is still only closing at .3 > .4 cents.
Don't have to 'believe' in a stock to take a seat on the board, they get paid,
no doubt do or shall get free shares, throw in some free first class trips to Oz.
Be mad to NOT take a seat on the board.
Could throw in a USA director, a Chinese director, get the whole world interested.
Certainly nobody in Australia is feeling the love.
You're telling me to...……………………………………….
"
I would suggest that you read the recent (and change of) appointments ann's and if you are astute enough you may get an idea of what the potential plan is.
"
Hmmm. So even if I read these so called change of appointments anns.
(of which I can't see anything under that heading),
just like yourself, I would have to ASSUME why he took a BoD position?
"
I would assume that him taking a BoD position would be to promote AUL in the UK market
"
That's all that all you guys are doing, is making assumptions as to what is/isn't happening,
and the reason why.
Current mngmnt is not overly forthcoming on details in regards to what they do or why.
This is becoming tedious, same old, same old.
Why don't you all come back when you have solid reasoning, actual dates,
substantiated facts, etc, instead of assumptions and guesses.