You must of missed my question, show me where I accused you of insider trading!
You can use any excuse you want, acting for yourself isn't a crime and the majority of traders will do that wether it was by good luck/good dyor or whatever is irrelevant, but you had no qualms in rushing to post anything pro GPP management until you actually saw the light, but maybe that certain poster was only being critical of your posts because you were never able to substantiate the content. I mean, from my recollection (and apologies if I am wrong) but saying "you need to read and understand the announcements", "its all there" and "read between the lines" does leave it open to debate and conjecture.
I sleep at night, maintaining my integrity because contrary to the popular belief of a few members of the GPP cheer squad and the GPPLTH group my intentions re: picking flaws with management are solely wanting them to abide by the listing rules, being transparent and doing what they are paid to do by increasing share holder value. I own shares in GPP, they are deep in the red but it doesn't mean I change my morals and let keeping management accountable go by the wayside.
My posts don't sit well with those that are under the illusion that management are a great team, etc - MEH.
Speaking of management,
We retain Flavelle in a technical consulting role, and even award him KMP bonus options - for what? Another failed attempt to grab a handout from the government?
We engaged the OHD expert in Trench, the new GPP messiah that every one ranted and raved about the so called expert to be our new COO and to date he has overseen two failed attempts at getting government grants.
We engage expert consultants to write and oversee our applications, maybe they should of read the scope of the funding before advising us on how to apply = fail (get a refund from their payments) and goodness me, why we need to engage international accountants has me baffled.
The criteria for the RJIP grants was very clear and precise, at no point could I see GPP getting approval they just never met the criteria. For one and prior to the placement and SPP, (and this was post when the application closed) they would of had to have shown that they could match funding and to this extent they couldn't.
The title itself - Regional Jobs Incentive Programme is designed (in one part)
to deliver sustainable employment and I actually fail to see how GPP's application which was for consideration of project feasibility funding could possibly achieve
any sustained employment.
I'm with
@Tragore I brought into GPP on the OHD project, I don't think it is dead but funding will be needed and as
@Scarpa has indication funds could be generated from Morabisi. I only say could because it will have to be sold off for them funds to come to fruition because the pipe dream of GPP ever mining this, is only a pipe dream and honestly its only until the next big thing comes along. So far their track record and short 10 year history is intact, they have failed to invest shareholders funds in a project that has actually delivered.
Here is hoping, for the shareholders that Turesi may just be the one that they luck out on.
All the above IMO only
