Quite possibly, ddxb, but the crux of the problem was that AGS...

Quite possibly, ddxb, but the crux of the problem was that AGS had a signed a contract that only the Board was privy to. And the board made the decision to go to court purportedly in the interests of all shareholders, but with them alone having the full knowledge of the contract's terms and conditions.

Shareholders were never party to the JV agreement and its several variations, but supported the boards decision believing there must have been sound grounds for taking legal action. That AGS then whittled down $40 million + of shareholders money (CRs) to the desperate situation where there was no cash left) I found astounding.

Good luck with your trading, ddxb. And GL everyone. I hold no negativity towards new shareholders who saw an opportunity to gain. We would all have done the same, but hopefully we would still see what was unfair for those who supported the company and its ill fated decisions over the years.