Originally posted by Purpose
Very few companies on the ASX have had a second strike, lost control and be forced to hold a 'spill meeting' and have then not resigned worthwith.
The tribe has spoken but they refuse to accept.
The reality now is that this board is now officially in caretaker mode, and looking at the results of the votes on the remuneration report that were required to obtain in the 2017 AGM and now the 2018 AGM there will questions to answer to ASIC as the 2017 AGM included 8,333,334 for Me Ping Huang, the only difference to 2018, some issuance aside.
So the fight to put some value into PDF and re list has just begun. Round one complete
I will be extremely surprised to see the same names as Directors in 3 months time given the blow just delivered. Now maybe a good time to fire a left hand which they won't see coming.
What's with the resolution 2 results?
DYOR. IMO
I was just looking at the detail and you are right, good pick up. The results for Resolution 2 and Resolution 3 are at odds given they were a vote specific to the same party, a company director, Ray Taylor.
Appears someone miscounted and the cross-checking did not pick it up either, wonder if the Company Secretary will issue an amended set of results on Monday. Makes you wonder how bad was it for the last AGM and the previous AGM and the etc.etc.
Mind you in this case the outcome for either Resolution does not change but history is another story. Maybe a job for the new Directors next year before any relisting as it may have an impact on the number of shares issued in the past.
Oh what a mess!