Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

PDF

Click for more information

0.00%

0.0¢ pacific dairies limited

Ann: Results of Meeting, page-9

First 9 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Dixie Chick

322 Posts.

10

27/09/18

11:48

Post #: 35877788
Share

Originally posted by Purpose ↑

The following is what the Chairman, Mr Duckett said to questions asked.

To resolution 4. Cleanthis Pilakis 'is not a related party' of the company. The shares are registered at the PDF company address and the above is not a company or registered business.
The company had to cancel shares from this resolution for related party transactions which was announced the day before the meeting.

The cattle which was suggested were purchased in July 2016, which was not denied by the Chairman, have not provided any income directly to the company and still don't. Any income generated would be credited against the farm purchase. A written agreement to this effect is in place.

The cattle are not registered in the company name. This was confirmed by the Chairman.

The cattle numbers have not increased due to calving in the last 2 years but will do so this year.

The Chairman was unclear If any of the crop grown would be sold or used for fodder.

The Chairman was unclear if any of the 40 cattle recently sold off the farm was part of the purchased stock of the company.

The Chairman was questioned as to the debt funding and asked to confirm if Mr Podaridis of Pramana Capital was still involved. The shareholder claimed that he was recently told personally by Mr Duckett that he was negotiating the debt funding without Mr Podaridis. The chairmans response was 'things change'

The meeting was closed off to non shareholders and a financial adviser for shareholders was not allowed in but Gordon Anthony of Asia Pacific Logistics was.

The main questions to all of the above is,

Why are the cattle not on one of the 2 farms that is approved by shareholders for purchase but on a farm that is not.
No mention or comment was made on farm 1 which is now also up for sale. This farm will also need to be replaced in the plan along with the other farm the company acknowledged as sold one year after the sale.

No comment was made on the terms of the debt funding.

Why have the cattle and any income earned not been moved to one of the shareholder approved farms?

Why did the Chairman not abstain his votes and that of his related parties for resolution 2 which concerned his own re election?

The above is my memory of events of the meeting.

Shareholders can form their own opinion if the board is complying with 'due care and diligence'
Provisions of the Act.

IMO. DYOR

Expand

Originally posted by Purpose ↑

The following is what the Chairman, Mr Duckett said to questions asked.

To resolution 4. Cleanthis Pilakis 'is not a related party' of the company. The shares are registered at the PDF company address and the above is not a company or registered business.
The company had to cancel shares from this resolution for related party transactions which was announced the day before the meeting.

The cattle which was suggested were purchased in July 2016, which was not denied by the Chairman, have not provided any income directly to the company and still don't. Any income generated would be credited against the farm purchase. A written agreement to this effect is in place.

The cattle are not registered in the company name. This was confirmed by the Chairman.

The cattle numbers have not increased due to calving in the last 2 years but will do so this year.

The Chairman was unclear If any of the crop grown would be sold or used for fodder.

The Chairman was unclear if any of the 40 cattle recently sold off the farm was part of the purchased stock of the company.

The Chairman was questioned as to the debt funding and asked to confirm if Mr Podaridis of Pramana Capital was still involved. The shareholder claimed that he was recently told personally by Mr Duckett that he was negotiating the debt funding without Mr Podaridis. The chairmans response was 'things change'

The meeting was closed off to non shareholders and a financial adviser for shareholders was not allowed in but Gordon Anthony of Asia Pacific Logistics was.

The main questions to all of the above is,

Why are the cattle not on one of the 2 farms that is approved by shareholders for purchase but on a farm that is not.
No mention or comment was made on farm 1 which is now also up for sale. This farm will also need to be replaced in the plan along with the other farm the company acknowledged as sold one year after the sale.

No comment was made on the terms of the debt funding.

Why have the cattle and any income earned not been moved to one of the shareholder approved farms?

Why did the Chairman not abstain his votes and that of his related parties for resolution 2 which concerned his own re election?

The above is my memory of events of the meeting.

Shareholders can form their own opinion if the board is complying with 'due care and diligence'
Provisions of the Act.

IMO. DYOR

Expand

OMG Purpose just read your post, do you mean that there have been no calvings up till

Originally posted by Purpose ↑

The following is what the Chairman, Mr Duckett said to questions asked.

To resolution 4. Cleanthis Pilakis 'is not a related party' of the company. The shares are registered at the PDF company address and the above is not a company or registered business.
The company had to cancel shares from this resolution for related party transactions which was announced the day before the meeting.

The cattle which was suggested were purchased in July 2016, which was not denied by the Chairman, have not provided any income directly to the company and still don't. Any income generated would be credited against the farm purchase. A written agreement to this effect is in place.

The cattle are not registered in the company name. This was confirmed by the Chairman.

The cattle numbers have not increased due to calving in the last 2 years but will do so this year.

The Chairman was unclear If any of the crop grown would be sold or used for fodder.

The Chairman was unclear if any of the 40 cattle recently sold off the farm was part of the purchased stock of the company.

The Chairman was questioned as to the debt funding and asked to confirm if Mr Podaridis of Pramana Capital was still involved. The shareholder claimed that he was recently told personally by Mr Duckett that he was negotiating the debt funding without Mr Podaridis. The chairmans response was 'things change'

The meeting was closed off to non shareholders and a financial adviser for shareholders was not allowed in but Gordon Anthony of Asia Pacific Logistics was.

The main questions to all of the above is,

Why are the cattle not on one of the 2 farms that is approved by shareholders for purchase but on a farm that is not.
No mention or comment was made on farm 1 which is now also up for sale. This farm will also need to be replaced in the plan along with the other farm the company acknowledged as sold one year after the sale.

No comment was made on the terms of the debt funding.

Why have the cattle and any income earned not been moved to one of the shareholder approved farms?

Why did the Chairman not abstain his votes and that of his related parties for resolution 2 which concerned his own re election?

The above is my memory of events of the meeting.

Shareholders can form their own opinion if the board is complying with 'due care and diligence'
Provisions of the Act.

IMO. DYOR

Expand

Purpose if the cattle have not calved in the last 2 years this is a disgrace. The R2 heifers that they purchased 2 years ago would have had their heads chopped off by now if they had not been producing, no efficient experienced dairy farmer calves their heifers down at 4y.o. GOK what they did actually purchase could have been weaned calves, but this mob wouldn't sh!t from clay.

IMO DYOR

PDF Price at posting: 2.9¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Week 47 Wrap: HotCopper users' most watched; Brent lifts on Putin's scary letter; RFK dents CSL

PYC

Scientific conference spotlights PYC's work on blindness disease treatment

HotCopper Highlights: Your most watched stocks for Week 47, 2024

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

GRL

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

DUI

Panic, paranoia, and gangland politics: HotCopper users react to Dubber's missing $26M

LPE

Sales growth pushes Lovisa's fortunes (and shares) upwards

SIG

Dale Gillham's weekly wrap: Sigma-Chemist Warehouse merger creates pharma powerhouse

BTH

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...

First 9 Last

Add PDF (ASX) to my watchlist