Ann: Results of Meeting, page-10

I can't believe it Sevo. You are clearly not a stupid person but your biased dillusion is only outdone by the Chair of this perennial underperformer.

A vote against the remuneration report AND the re-election of the Chair AND FOR A SPILL is what many will agree is a reflection of the inability of this management to deliver on this project in a timely and commercially focused manner. They have taken many, many years to stagger to a point which is now still several years behind at least one of its peers.

You and Panda will come back with "but we are so big and others are so small" but that arguement is valueless when others are producing SOP and RWD are still stuffing around with "big dreams".

Reverse your argument and it was only Dr Mick and a few other related shareholders that got these other resolutions over the line.

This so called "rogue" is at worst only doing what Dr Mick has done - or tried doing- elsewhere himself. Refer Echo Resources 2016!

...