Ann: Results of Meeting, page-92

Ok I'll bite now but only considering that in the last 2 days anyone that has posted on the GPP thread (other than yourself) has either:
a) Poor knowledge
b) Lack of research
c) Low or no knowledge of how a penny stock travels the path to becoming a blue chip
d) Poor trading skills (take into consideration one of the posters you inferred that to, is a day trader)

I would also like to know why you think I have been directed wrong? or exactly what do you mean by that statement.
Plus explain what you mean you only post here to stop the 100% crap?

Looking for a bit more truth? I would suggest that remark be directed at management and more so in regards to the OHD/CTL project. Speaking of, what time frame would you suggest would be acceptable on this project getting to the production stage, bearing in mind that it is a disruptive technology but also consider that in the company's own announcements dating back to 2012 they were going to build a pilot plant.........
Is 6 years (and still counting) for the evolution of a penny stock with a disruptive but proven technology acceptable ?

You seem to only factor in the company's Lithium project, have you researched the OHD/CTL project which is the real flagship of the company, albeit they got side tracked jumping on the Lithium boom and chasing their next dream.
Finally,
What makes you an authoritative on how penny stocks trade? Mind you, I do have some doubts as you seem fixated with using only information that comes from off the ASX web site, there are hundreds of more sophisticated and valuable tools that can be sourced from off the internet.
So is it really only a boom or bust play? Even with its proven technology?
Would you also be critical of the investors that took a position in for example PLS when it was trading cheap at 3c? or its ok because they went boom?
Would it be a different set of circumstances if GPP's share price had of continued going up, even though the same investors you are critical of now bought in a cheap Lithium play then? I mean, it is the same investors you are talking about and through no fault of their own the company has disappointed, fluffed announcements up, failed to deliver on timelines and the list goes on ........

A poster once suggested that the management of GPP do not know how to be successful, at the time I thought it was a little left field but I have changed my thinking.

cheers
All IMO