I’m not here to cross promote nor am I Gary’s advisor. The downfalls are pretty obvious, and the clear winners in the market have clear and consistent communication and marketing strategies if anyone here cares to read around a little. I don’t need to spell it out for all and sundry. Compare ann’s between NAE and SML on the same topic for instance - I note you have already discussed this too, yet here we are again.
I’m also not one to ramp a stock just because I have an interest in it. I’ll call as I see it at the time whether good or bad. Assets here may well be good, but they are not being used to promote the company and keep the market enthused. 4 announcements from a 9/10 month drilling program doesn’t exactly scream ethusiam or encourage investment from the directors. These moments are opportunities to regularly update and market the company as an upcoming success story. Explorers actually spend little time doing what they say they are going to do, yet here we are with quite a large and long drill program with very few and poorly timed updates. It’s all about building momentum, not losing it. Silence is deafening down this end of town and the market is fickle and hungry for information.
To me, it seems you are close to the source of my (and others) issues, hence your point of view towards Gary. That’s fine, I’m ok with not agreeing.
If NAE change their communication style and marketing style, I’ll be happy to recognise that too. Until then, I’m of the firm belief they can do more whilst the SP flounders consistently at record lows.
There was a time last year by where interest in NAE rocketed, the directors were unable to capitalise on it and made some rookie errors that stalled momentum and drove investors at the time away. One could also argue that it discouraged potential investors from buying in too - I gave them the benefit of the doubt as I had done quite well at the time, admittadely though, that has maybe been a downfall in my own decision making. I could have walked away with near 6 figures should I have done so at the one of my initial doubts creeping in. No point dwelling on that though.
Ultimately, companies are judged on their SP performance - kinda speaks for itself at the moment, don’t you think? With results close, tell me Subs, why aren’t investors flocking to NAE.... no battery metal excuses either, that just doesn’t fly with me.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NAE
- Ann: Results of Meeting
Ann: Results of Meeting, page-53
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NAE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.4¢ |
Change
-0.001(11.1%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.175M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | 0.4¢ | $20K | 5M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
38 | 19505374 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.5¢ | 11453156 | 6 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 2200000 | 0.006 |
9 | 8299899 | 0.005 |
6 | 3650000 | 0.004 |
3 | 2622888 | 0.003 |
3 | 4000100 | 0.002 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.007 | 2536904 | 6 |
0.008 | 3066187 | 5 |
0.009 | 1057001 | 6 |
0.010 | 5904545 | 3 |
0.011 | 500000 | 1 |
Last trade - 10.06am 26/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
NAE (ASX) Chart |