At least there is one non holder with a rational discussion. You...

First 28 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Catalogue

793 Posts.

9

16/03/18

12:43

Post #: 31805746
Share

Originally posted by Grant62 ↑

Catalogue,
it is quite possible that they will not draw down on the $150M (some, but not all). If so, however, then the bond holders will still need to have the funds parked away somewhere so that they can be readily accessed anytime in the future. So, whilst I consider your point made (ie: there is no indication of drawing down the full amount), it is also very likely that the facility will comprise two primary costs:
* the coupon rate (so the 8% rate on drawn down funds); and
* a facilities management fee (of sorts) reflecting the opportunity cost requirement of having the facility in place, reserved and the funds assured (could be anything from 1% - 3% depending upon the source of the funds being obtained).

The one thing though that can arguably be assured is that the Bond facility will not be at a nil holding cost to the Company. So, there will be a cost irrespective of the amounts drawn down (if any).

Expand

At least there is one non holder with a rational discussion. You are right the clearing house and the company who provides the settlements will need their transaction costs. What that is I have no idea but I would imagine the IM they based their investment decision on must have satisfied their capacity to deliver with cash flow from the dairies.

Last edited by Catalogue: 16/03/18

PDF Price at posting: 2.9¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

ACW

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

CXM

'Taking money from the market': Garbage giant cleans up as this week's Hot Stock tip

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

There are more pages in this discussion • 59 more messages in this thread...

First 28 Last

Add PDF (ASX) to my watchlist

At least there is one non holder with a rational discussion. You...

Top Stories

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

'Taking money from the market': Garbage giant cleans up as this week's Hot Stock tip

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects