Ann: Response to ASX Query re Appendix 5B , page-29

Glyna your posts are getting to having a hysterical note to them.

Head out to the Barossa and grab a bottle of wine and relax.

You worry about CHM shareholders much to much.

Its your belief that CHM directors are doing all of this for the benefit of a third party. I think you are wrong as directors and other stakeholders need a result delivered through the share price.

The best I can get is that the agreement is within normal market terms and I am happy with that. No one has lied to me as a shareholder.

You have started to raise issues about what happened to CHM pre the Deed of Comnpany Arrangements. Go have a read of what a DOCA achieves.

CHM has had two dodgy things done to it by its former management.

Part A was sorted out by current management who stopped liquidation process and had a DOCA approved.

ASIC are dealing with what happened to cause part A.

Part B is the subject of the MMX case which I am sure ASIC is also following very closely.

One of the people who ASIC are taking on is MMX co-defendent.

You have come up with your own set of numbers, the patient CHM holders see things a whole lot different.

What evidence are you relying on. Only an inside MMX person who is either feeding you inside information which I am sure is not the case or giving the company line which is that all is well.