Teck is responsible for the timing, not Tony. It was and remains, an expected date.
It's an expectation, NOT a time of the essence contractual term.
(How am I supposed to respond to this other than countering factually on the first proposition?
Couldn't and ever are so clearly a sledge it's fantastic to pretend otherwise).
Teck is responsible for the timing, not Tony. It was and...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
