the mineralisation is incredibly strong at surface as we know,...

the mineralisation is incredibly strong at surface as we know, so my guess would be that the deposit starts to widen and grade might fall off slowly.

I'm looking for to this 1000m hole and I'm super keen to see what grade min it is.

As esh pointed out.... An extra 200-300m could maybe add another 200,000 ounces plus. I'm expecting more at 1,500 ounces per vertical metre, and 1000m depth could be close to 1.5 million ounces(I dont expect that but Im hopeful) with good infill drilling.

11 year mine life drop it too 10 and add 200,000 ounces plus to the last 5 years or in our case the last 3 years due to the company decreasing mine life to 8 years. that's 8 years of 200,000 ounces per annum.

As nord said, it could be a potential game changer. I believe so as he previously mentioned B2 were looking for a project 200,000 ounces per annum plus for 10 years. it would be great if waf could do that on there own without Toega.

Even combining the two projects together with that scenario in mind or with the current one could turn burkina into the next power house for gold, sort of like fekola in mali.

I understand fekola is in a league of its own. someone here mentioned that management in the past had been offered low bowl take over overs for projects. fekola was just that and even Clive Johnson (b2) mention it in a conference over a year ago. Due to no other bids for fekola, he said.

I believe this project will continue to give and I hope an offer does not happen or occur before we complete the 1000m hole.

I'm with this one until the end