I think that will depend on the life of mine at the open pit/s...

I think that will depend on the life of mine at the open pit/s at Tabakoroni and the ongoing recovery from oxide and transitional ore from those pits. A high headline guidance production number for the new CY reporting period might get other people exited but not me. There is little point producing marginal ore from Ravenswood if your operational cash flows are close to zero or negative and putting a high guidance number into the market only creates room for disappointment if that mine is sold or spun-off during the year. As mentioned before I prefer cash flow and profit per ounce over producing ounces for ounces sake. Now the cat is out of the bag at Ravenswood we are better off getting that mine off the books. As mentioned in the conference call we can get much more immediate return on capital by building the low carbon roaster at Syama for minimal capital costs to treat the carbon enriched concentrates in stockpiles that contain well over $100 million in gold. That should really become a priority once the cave mine is bedded down. Esh