A "small" but excellent view Zencol. Not knowing what the TOs...

A "small" but excellent view Zencol. Not knowing what the TOs would be wanting in such a very specialized environment makes it difficult to comment. But, I have no doubt that EOPL MUST be a participant in all discussions IF the TOs are wanting to stick to the letter of the law.
Will they compromise and accept jobs in the restoration and maintenance stage when the miners move on to the next section just to keep EOPL out of the equation? In fact they already have such a precedent and that land would revert back entirely to them when that section of the mining is completed.
That certainly would fit in with long term and environmental issues which the TOs would be ideal to conduct and supervise as they do in other areas if you see their web site.
EXAMPLE.
"In 2012 EAC (Ewamian Aboriginal Corporation) signed a 3 year Lease with the Indigenous Land Corporation to manage and protect the conservation and cultural values of Talaroo. As well as being a base for the Rangers Talaroo will also provide many employment and training opportunities for Ewamian people in the future. Talaroo will be officially handed back to Ewamian people in 2017.
The roles and objectives of the corporation are:

1. Manage and administer the Indigenous Land and Sea Ranger Program (4 Rangers) – funded by DEHP
2. Natural Resource Management on Ewamian Country (Weed, Pest, Fire and Feral Animal Management)

Again, boils down to us not knowing who are involved and what are the issues.
Until we (shareholders) know those basics we really are restricted to educated guesses.
SURELY shareholders should know the basics so "guessing" is eliminated, because while the market is forced to guess, how can that be classified as being "informed" which the ASX is "supposed" to demand by its "rules"?