Great update Mole and thanks for following up regarding the...

First 18 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
tmc19

163 Posts.

02/02/17

09:04

Post #: 22307705
Share

Originally posted by The Mole ↑

KM,

I have made enquiries and have been advised the $US83.05 is the price received inclusive of shipping costs. They used the term "realised". I was told it was very clear in announcement.

So that's a great selling price.

But this raises some major issues.

The Platts 62% average price for October was $US57.20 per tonne (remember it was only $US55.20 on 1/10 and dropped to $54.10 on 10/10).
For November the Platts 62% average price was $US71.87.
For December it was $US79.52.
For the quarter the average price was $US69.57.

If they were paid for the 65.3% grade that would result in a 5.32% increase to $US73.28.

GBG stated also that they got a 7% premium which would add another $US5.13 to $US78.13.

But GBG received $US83.05.

They received nearly $US5.00 more than they stated. Or they can't do the maths!

So my assessment on 24 Jan 2017 of $US79.20 excluding depreciation may be some near the mark except we have to add maintenance costs. Which as you have pointed out may be a major cost.

Interestingly so far this quarter there are 21 ships which should have departed by about 15 Feb. This makes a possible 42 for March quarter. If they continue exporting at that rate then should be 9m tonnes for year.

But this prediction excludes any shut down for maintenance.

For Jan 2017 the 62% Platts average price was $US80.27. Add 5.32% for 65.3 grade equals $US84.54. This is some $US11.26 above the comparable 65.3% Platts selling price for the Dec 16 quarter price of $US73.28 mentioned above.

Does this mean that they could have received $US84.54 + $US11.26 = $US95.80 for January sales?

Who knows with the veil between us and KML.

We will have to wait till April to know this answer but it will provide us with a better clue as to what is the real selling price.

Expand

Great update Mole and thanks for following up regarding the Shipping costs. That one has been debated on here for a long time without any conclusion.

GBG Price at posting: 3.2¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Chaos reigns markets – so let's take stock of where we're at ahead of December

ACW

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

MTM

Australian Rare Earths bullish on early-stage uranium potential at Overland, SA

OCN

Southern Cross Gold zooms in on 9 new high-grade zones above 20g/t at Golden Dyke

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

SHN

Chimeric clocks $4.17M R&D tax rebate from Canberra

Watchdog takes Webjet to court over alleged 'false' flight prices with hidden fees

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

PME

Pro Medicus signs landmark $330M deal to roll out imaging platform in US hospitals

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...

First 18 Last

Add GBG (ASX) to my watchlist

Great update Mole and thanks for following up regarding the...

Top Stories

Chaos reigns markets – so let's take stock of where we're at ahead of December

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

Australian Rare Earths bullish on early-stage uranium potential at Overland, SA

Southern Cross Gold zooms in on 9 new high-grade zones above 20g/t at Golden Dyke

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

Chimeric clocks $4.17M R&D tax rebate from Canberra

Watchdog takes Webjet to court over alleged 'false' flight prices with hidden fees

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

Pro Medicus signs landmark $330M deal to roll out imaging platform in US hospitals

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects