Im starting to wonder if directors are acting in the best in interests of ALL shareholders by retaining a corporate advisor that has little to show for BLZ and CIZ. Does this amount to oppressive conduct also?
So much corporate activity. Isnt it time directors engaged a corporate advisor that can start bringing some quality projects to the table?
Ann: Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BLZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.002(40.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.142M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.5¢ | 0.7¢ | 0.5¢ | $14.17K | 2.299M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1000000 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7¢ | 1628565 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.57pm 02/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BLZ (ASX) Chart |
