Ann: Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 4C, page-18

Haha, you being frustrated by my posts is pretty amusing, and only adds a nice garnish to me posting.

If you think I am capable of lowering the price you have a more lofty opinion of my own abilities than I do. The share price is due to the problems I describe, not because I am describing them. If I actually was responsible for lowering the share price by exposing information I should be thanked, but it's not what's happening. AEB would be just a bad a train wreck with a similar price if I'd never heard of it.

Speaking of motives, I've already described them multiple times, yet you ask again while in the same breath accuse me of repetition. People have speculated about my.motives for years, but clearly the only one which makes any sense is the same one I have been happy to discuss for all these years.

As for a takeover, why on earth would anyone possibly want to do such a crazy thing? Let's look at what the company has: fake energy technology worth less than nothing, and a legal obligation to admit that (which is why it's worth less than nothing - no law abiding person would want to touch that!), a failed nutriceutical venture, a couple of failed odds and sods, and a new marijuana crop. No assets to speak of, nothing which less money than the cost of a takeover could buy.

In a nutshell, a takeover would result in an extremely expensive purchases of assets worth far less than the purchase price, which would come with nasty legal obligations and a bad reputation. There is absolutely no motive to do so other than the same owners moving the company into other names in order to avoid the problems associated with their hideous reputation, and even that would be far more trouble and expense than it's worth.

It is very safe to say a takeover isn't going to happen.