Ann: Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report, page-4

To agree strongly with you where I can.
I think using a long term price of $7.12 +/- 25 c/ lb for Ni (per the FFS) seems most appropriate and the project appears to be a real goer at that price. My interest per my own modelling is in management tying down the total production price (AISC or All in Sustainable Cost) more securely in The PFS.

I'll admit what I don't know or am unsure of, which is the shorter term outlook you've mentioned of towards the end of the year. Citigroup favours your confident assertion.

To that my answer to Sci9249’s Post #: 34447878 on what's in the Cu price, is seen My Post #: 34450056 and I am comfortable with that in retrospect.

From the Western press we can see what Trump is asserting. My questioning of experienced "old China hands" who I trust is more line with that of the South China Morning Post and that Xi is totally inscrutable.

Conversation with experienced fund managers of the same ilk results in we don't understand what Trump intends can gain form his actions but is raising the recession treat level. I'll keep doing my due diligence.

We are probably approaching the same position one from the top and one from the bottom.