Correct. The UK based consultant should have been made aware of...

Correct. The UK based consultant should have been made aware of the jorc requirements for wording purposes and clarity or not engaged at all. Would have been nice from a news flow perspective but they have muffed it up and it now appears to be going in the too hard basket. Would like to proven wrong on the latter.

We don’t need what is now an ‘internal scoping level review’ to give us confidence to conduct further drilling. We’ve now just wasted money imo and we’ve got no update or advertising put to the broader market to bare any benefit from it.

My concerns are we keep missing the boat to provide valuable updates to the market, and no matter what is said, both here and to NAE, this doesn’t appear to change. This is a major concern imo.