Ann: Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report, page-47

So you believe with all the evidence they have regarding the deposit i.e continuation down dip and potentially along strike that they spent upwards of 10's of thousands of dollars on a scoping-level review for a mining and processing study that they had no intention of releasing to the market? They don't need a scoping-level review to confirm the need to drill out the deposit further. The JORC code and previous positive drill data already tells them they need to do that. You're really clutching at straws now, subs.

Kruiser said:

"Not as positive as Gary makes it out to be IMO"

You said:

"Your comment that Gary is misleading us is just wrong"

Two completely different statements. Tell me that isn't twisting someones words again?

PS Gary is on record as saying the mining and processing studies (scoping-level reviews) would be released in April. Go back and listen to Proactive investors if you don't believe me. Then go and think about it logically, and then tell me why it wouldn't have been announced to the market. I can tell you why, but you don't seem to like the truth.... Contact Gary too if you like.