Hey plonks,Happy to inform.1. The 'we' for the agm, is termed...

Hey plonks,

Happy to inform.
1. The 'we' for the agm, is termed for those present at the mtg, presummed to be s/holders, staff, and possibly reporters?

2. Production figures were gleaned from the opening segment of the latest report (of which 'sparked' this topic). You'll find the graph on page 3. Just stating what's reported, and i believe it to be this good. My % calculations are purely based on these noted values!
n.b. False reporting is offensive and offendable, & i presume mgt to be reporting correctly.
The forward productivity portion of the graph 'wood' obviously be presummed based on past and current achievements, projecting similar to ++ going forward.
As you will see, the motion is in place!
I look at big brother gunns, and see that their income stream is so strong despite and besides what the m.i.s. is doing / contributing. So cheers to fea mgt for searing this direction (value adding).
Remember earlier report that noted fea purchased this set-up for peanuts!!

3. As for me? I'm just another s'holder, nothing more, nothing less.
Just like to analyse data and reports where i can, and aim to better my investment by justifying ~ TO ME, that what i've done or about to do, is heading in the right direction. Sometimes i might read things incorrectly, and welcome positive criticism.
As noted on previous occasion(s), i'm happy to try to help those who've helped me - i.e. h/copper contributors! I also aim to note aspects correctly, and happy to check my source (public source) again if required.

4. So, not into tarots and other ..... Just reading and listening plonks.

So i'm sticking to my brief on what i've gleaned, and judging by the calcs, happy with my fea investment, v happy :)

Have a better one,

Cheers :)