below is an example of 'theoreticalism'
AMN = grade of 8.25 vs RWD grade of 11.35
AMN scoping study said: "steady-state brine extraction of 66.5 gigalitres (“GL”) per year over a 20 year life... for a production target of 370,000 tonnes per annum (“tpa”) of SOP"
RWD scoping study said: "60-70 million cubic metres of brine delivered to the system each year...the production of 400,000 tonnes per annum of SOP"
now both desk-top estimates are similar yet the RWD grade is 38% higher
the most recent AMN presentation says: "370,000 tonnes per annum target... trench extraction of 78.5Mtpa of groundwater "
now using the scoping study assumptions with a 67% recovery:
AMN = 66.5GL x 8.25 grade x 67% recovery = 367,579 tonnes
RWD (low case) = 60.0GL x 11.35 grade x 67% recovery = 456,270 tonnes
RWD (high case) = 70.0GL x 11.35 grade x 67% recovery = 532,315 tonnes
i think the significant differences here show how theoretical previous assumptions are
the impression is either AMN have over-estimated or RWD have under-estimated
..........
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Pre-Feasibility Study Update
below is an example of 'theoreticalism' AMN = grade of 8.25 vs...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 56 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RWD (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
7.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.114M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.7¢ | 7.7¢ | 7.1¢ | $34.43K | 481.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 624456 | 7.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
7.6¢ | 500 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 189708 | 0.100 |
1 | 10000 | 0.080 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.105 | 24000 | 1 |
0.110 | 8500 | 2 |
0.115 | 10000 | 1 |
0.120 | 32686 | 2 |
0.130 | 96000 | 3 |
Last trade - 15.56pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
RWD (ASX) Chart |