No, again your bending the facts and making stuff up. Knight Piesold did AMN's hydrogeological work for the PFS. It's clearly stated in the PFS.
In RWDs case was it Global Groundwater and Strategic Water Management. Knight Piesold designed the trenches and ponds. Yes, it refers to "hydrological design" but did this rely on the results of "hydrological investigation" performed by Strategic Water Management? Or did they rely on the trench pumping trials performed by Pendragon Environmental Services?
Who knows? Again it's murky as to what the facts are. But here's a fact....when they pumped at 8L/s it drew down so not steady state. When they upped it to 10L/s it drew down even faster. So when they started at 15L/s it would have sucked dry in a few months. Now lets talk about "coning".
Maybe you should give all four of your consutlants who might have contributed to the imaginary figures a call? I'm not overly concerned about AMN's so long as the stock price keeps inching higher.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- RWD
- Ann: PFS Confirms LD as a Globally Significant SOP Project
Ann: PFS Confirms LD as a Globally Significant SOP Project, page-159
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RWD (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
8.0¢ |
Change
-0.004(4.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $9.114M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
8.0¢ | 8.0¢ | 8.0¢ | $1.215K | 15.18K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 15000 | 7.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.0¢ | 625004 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 189708 | 0.100 |
1 | 10000 | 0.080 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
0 | 0 | 0.000 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.105 | 24000 | 1 |
0.110 | 8500 | 2 |
0.115 | 10000 | 1 |
0.120 | 32686 | 2 |
0.130 | 96000 | 3 |
Last trade - 10.06am 26/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
RWD (ASX) Chart |