Sorry Panda, but if you’re referring to the post at 13:12:10...

Sorry Panda, but if you’re referring to the post at 13:12:10 where you say that because of the actual observations it’s OK to make a guess of 50% over then that’s not really an answer. “It’s probably on the money” according to you is not sufficient.

That my friend is why the MC here is 1/5th if AMN. There’s no empirical evidence to support 15 Ls that I can see. You want me to believe you because “you reckon it’s about on the money” is one thing. The board of directors expecting the market to do same is another. And the whole MR buying on market is supposed to help you believe.

I’m just asking for some simple facts to support a key input into the hydrogeological model.