Originally posted by Smilez
NEMIO.. at least we were told with Philips/POC1 that it was paid R&D and when each of the 5 milestones was due to be completed and who was doing the work.. this time is zip! I can understand under promise over deliver strategy but this is to the extreme imo.. i know the battery space is very competitive right now but there could have been a few more details provided..
"The MTA sets out a clear methodology for the evaluation of the AnteoCoatTM technology".. if its clear why not tell us the basic methodology and some basic timelines ?
It this is miles ahead of Philips why does the market not believe it? Because its the same old same old carrot dangled in front of the ass !! ...
Smilez
I think keeping basic methodology would form part of the confidentiality agreement. Any company wouldn't want their IP exposed.
Why doesn't the market believe it? I think because its early stages still and until they convert all of this into paid revenue it will still be a spec. I think once the next stage is completed then this could be a different story.
